Legal Opinion

Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 4, 1935No. K-169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

Since the original opinion (6 F. Supp. 574) was rendered, the parties have made a stipulation with reference to certain additional facts material to the decision of the case but not heretofore presented to the court.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for new trial in which amendments to the findings are requested, and the matter of the recovery of the portion of the overasséssment for 1918, which was applied upon a deficiency for 1917 is reargued at great length. In the original opinion the court held that plaintiff’s claim for refund of the taxes of 1918 was rejected, and it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. Clinton Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MalleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  2. Gans S. S. Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. JaffrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Pioneer Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Gage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API