Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
Since the original opinion (6 F. Supp. 574) was rendered, the parties have made a stipulation with reference to certain additional facts material to the decision of the case but not heretofore presented to the court.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for new trial in which amendments to the findings are requested, and the matter of the recovery of the portion of the overasséssment for 1918, which was applied upon a deficiency for 1917 is reargued at great length. In the original opinion the court held that plaintiff’s claim for refund of the taxes of 1918 was rejected, and it is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
- Clinton Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edwards v. MalleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Gans S. S. Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States v. JaffrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Pioneer Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Gage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936