Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Waldock

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1930No. 20604PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHepner, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty and confined in the state penitentiary by virtue of a commitment on a judgment of conviction rendered in the district, court of McCurtain county. He was sentenced for a term of five years’ imprisonment for the crime of embezzlement. Prom the judgment of. the district court he appealed to the Criminal Court of Appeals, and the judgment was there affirmed. Waldock v. State (Okla. Cr.) 276 Pac. 509.

Upon the presentation of petition to this' court a rule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Waldock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Ex Parte BighorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Ex Parte TidwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Phelps v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API