Legal Opinion
Niveen Ismail v. County of Orange
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 2017No. 13-56866UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiff Niveen Ismail appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for claims arising under the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. We review de novo both a district court’s order granting a motion to dismiss, Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 911 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc), and a district court’s entry of summary judgment, Chale v. Allstate Life Ins. Co., 353 F.3d 742, 745 (9th Cir. 2003). A district court’s order granting a motion to reconsider is reviewed for abuse of discretion, Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty. v. ACandS, Inc., 5…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Agee v. Reno Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Briah v. ObieroDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Flesch v. RichterDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024
- Gary Ray Wilbourn, Jr. v. Ruth Pierce, Twin Falls Mayor; Clinton Doerr, individually and in his official capacity as a Twin Falls Police Officer; Twin Falls Police Department; Nicole Swafford, in her individual capacity for administrative and investigative acts onlyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
- Greathouse v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.