Justice v. Shaw

It is suggested in appellee’s brief that the defendants Christopher and Crane must be regarded as “subsequent purchasers with constructive notice of the pendency of this suit. ’ ’ It is conceded that they purchased the property and received their deeds before this action was begun, but the suggestion seems to be that, under the provisions of section 7651, Rev. St. 1913, the filing of the lis pendens in this action before their deeds were recorded makes them subsequent purchasers. The language of this section is: “Every person whose conveyance or incumbrance is subsequently executed or…