Legal Opinion

State v. Malone

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 9, 2007No. 23696-0-III, 23711-7-III, 24362-1-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

¶1 We have consolidated Michael E. Malone's two appeals and his personal restraint petition because they share an essential assignment of error. RAP 3.3(b). Mr. Malone withdrew his pleas of guilty to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API