Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Agnes Holbrook

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2004No. 02-4844Published

1DissentKing, Circuit Judge

Because the decision of the panel majority disregards precedent and will undermine the fair administration of justice in this Circuit, I write separately to explain my profound disagreement. Paragraph D(a) of the Plea Agreement provides, in plain terms, that in the event of a breach by Holbrook, the United States Attorney’s office may “declare this Agreement void and proceed to trial” (the “Trial Remedy”). Although the Trial Remedy is clear and unambiguous, the majority has avoided its application altogether. The majority opinion has thereby failed to apply controlling precedent, and its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Michael Lee HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. William Eugene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. James McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Frederick BryeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API