Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. O'Brien v. Heimlich, 08ap-521 (3-31-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 2009No. 08AP-521PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michael A. Heimlich, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting plaintiff-appellee, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, summary judgment on appellee's complaint seeking to enjoin appellant from residing within 1,000 feet of a school premises pursuant to R.C. 2950.031's residency restrictions for certain sexually oriented offenders. Because no genuine issue of material fact exists and appellee is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On August 24, 2005, appellant, represented by counsel, entered a guilty…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M6 Motors, Inc. v. Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re Raheem L.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. PageOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Mayle Bingo Co., L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. SafetyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- O'Brien v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.