Legal Opinion
Roslyn Savings Bank v. Jones
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.
These motions arise out of a surplus money proceeding which was conducted in order to determine the respective rights of the claimants to the surplus fund resulting from the foreclosure sale of the real property previously owned by the defendant Joseph E. Jones. Due to the apparent incompetency of Mr. Jones, who is presently a patient at a Veterans’ Administration Hospital in New York City, as well as the possibility of violations of section 489 of the Judiciary Law pertaining to champerty and maintenance, several interesting and novel questions have been raised which must be passed upon by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- House v. Amsdell Brewing & Malting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Velleman v. . RohrigNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Lobbett v. GalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flli Moretti Cereali S.P.A. v. Continental Grain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Barone v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bottenus v. BlackmanNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Hanspal v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019