Guzman v. Sabourin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Petitioner Elias Guzman (“Guzman”), a prisoner in state custody, brings this pro se habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). He alleges that (1) his guilty plea was not voluntary, knowing or intelligent due to the fact that he was heavily medicated during the allocution; (2) his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment both by making a crucial legal error and by testifying in opposition to Guzman’s subsequent motion to withdraw his guilty plea; and (3) the trial court’s failure to appoint new counsel violated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jesse Hines v. David Miller, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- State v. StricklandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- People v. OteroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Larweth v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Jesse Hines v. David Miller, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.