Legal Opinion

Guzman v. Sabourin

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 4, 2000No. 00 Civ. 1358(RWS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Petitioner Elias Guzman (“Guzman”), a prisoner in state custody, brings this pro se habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). He alleges that (1) his guilty plea was not voluntary, knowing or intelligent due to the fact that he was heavily medicated during the allocution; (2) his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment both by making a crucial legal error and by testifying in opposition to Guzman’s subsequent motion to withdraw his guilty plea; and (3) the trial court’s failure to appoint new counsel violated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jesse Hines v. David Miller, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. StricklandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. OteroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Larweth v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
  5. Jesse Hines v. David Miller, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API