Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. Neises

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBastow, J.

This appeal presents the issue as to the extent that injunctive relief should be granted pendente lite ~io an employer against its former employee pursuant to the provisions of a writing executed by the employee during the period of employment.

The corporate defendant (“Dennison”) and individual defendant (“Neises”) — presently employer and employee — appeal from an order enjoining each preliminarily from (a) continuing that relationshinjnsofar as it relates to employment in “ xerography ” and (bVyhe utilization by either of “ any information, knowledge or data ” NeTses maw have received…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yome v. GormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. May's Furs & Ready-To-Wear, Inc. v. BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Earl v. BrewerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Earl v. BrewerNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Gimbel Bros. v. Brook Shopping Centers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. SportsChannel America Associates v. National Hockey LeagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1978
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. Fedders Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API