Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of Estate of Allmaras

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2007No. 20060380Published

1DissentKapsner, Justice

[¶ 27] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 28] The petitioners appealed from a district court order denying their claim in Margaret Allmaras’s estate. I would conclude the petitioners failed to meet their burden of proof and to take the appropriate procedural steps to pursue their claim. I find no North Dakota law permitting the personal representative or district court to recreate nonprobate property when such a recreation would be contrary to an express provision in Margaret Allmaras’s valid will. Therefore, I would affirm the decision of the district court.

I

[¶ 29] A district court has discretionary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Gay & Taylor, Inc. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
  3. In Re Estate of GleesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Boone v. Estate of NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Matter of Conservatorship of KinneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API