Legal Opinion

Cecil W. Armstrong v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 1, 1961No. 532-56PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This case has been remanded to this court by the Supreme Court of the United States for the purpose of determining certain issues which are set out in the opinion in the case of Armstrong et al. v. United States, 1960, 364 U.S. 40, 80 S.Ct. 1563, 4 L.Ed.2d 1554. The essential facts and the issues are clearly stated in the Court’s opinion.

Briefly, the Rice Shipbuilding Corporation contracted for the construction of 11 Navy personnel boats. Pursuant to its terms, the Government terminated the contract before all of the boats had been completed. The completed boat and 10…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Burden v. HornsbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. In re the Valuation Proceedings under Sections 303(c) & 306Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1977
  3. Garod Radio Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Garod Radio Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API