Legal Opinion

Smith v. Zumbro

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

cited 1 High, Inj. § 22; Sand, SuitEq. 185; 34 W. Va. 406; 12 S. E. Rep. 724; Code, p. 728; Code Va. 1849; 1 Bart. Law Frac. 100, 104; 17 Graft. 321; Md. Stats.; 13 Ala. 208; 48 Am. Dec. 52; 30 W. Va. 200; 8 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, 200; 1 Greenl. Ev. § 74. cited Code, e. 133, s. 2; 26 W. Va. 821; 20 W. Va. 244; Code, c. 104, s. 18; 28 W. Va. 340; Bump, Fraud. Con. (2d Ed.) 53.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Judge:

On the 14th day of October, 1893, a suit in equity was instituted by George S. Smith against William A. Zumbro (in his own right, and as administrator of the estate of IL A. Zumbro, deceased), Rebecca J. Zumbro, George W. Silcott, Hagan Barr, and Annie E. Barr, in the Circuit Court of Calhoun county, the principal object of which suit appears to have been to settle certain partnership accounts existing between the plaintiff, George S. Smith, and the defendant William A. Zumbro, growing out of a partnership in the mercantile business carried on by them previous to the 11th day…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dickeschied v. Exchange BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Ruffner, Donnally & Co. v. Hewitt, Kercheval & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Foster's curator v. RisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
  4. Sandy v. RandallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Boggs v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Clifton G. Valentine v. Sugar Rock, Inc. and Gerald D. and Teresa D. HallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Adams v. Merced Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Harris v. OrrWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Waugh v. RichardsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API