Legal Opinion

Nittinger v. Holman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2003No. 34917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Shearing, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict in an action for battery and false imprisonment awarding compensatory and punitive damages and from the denial of a motion for a new trial. Appellants’ principal argument is that the corporation is not liable for punitive damages based on the actions of its security officers. We agree, but affirm the remainder of the judgment and the order denying a new trial.

FACTS

In the early morning hours of February 19, 1994, respondents, Dedric Holman, an African-American man, and Christina Edwards, a Caucasian woman,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ramos v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Williams v. Wal-Mart Stores IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Albuquerque Concrete Coring Co. v. Pan Am World Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. ThitchenerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sparks v. Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Terrell v. Central Washington Asphalt, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2016
  4. ASAP Storage, Inc. v. City of SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. ASAP Storage, Inc. v. City of SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API