Legal Opinion

York County Savings Bank v. Wentworth

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 24, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Writ of entry brought by a mortgagee under Sec. 9 of Chap. 104, R. S. 1930 to recover possession of certain real estate in the City of Saco. Plea, nul disseisin. The case was heard by a Justice of the Superior Court without intervention of jury. Sec. 26, Chap. 91, R. S. 1930. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. It comes to us on exceptions, first to the admission of certain testimony, and second to the decision.

The admitted evidence consisted of five mortgages covering the real estate in question and the notes secured by them. The defendant contended that the loans evidenced by them were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenfield Savings Bank v. AbercrombieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Gerrity v. Wareham Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Gilson v. Cambridge Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Jones v. Butler Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Leber v. GrosvenorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Koch v. Kiron State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. Danforth v. GautreauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API