Coleman v. Department of the Army
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*537Pursuant to Rule 178, respondent moves to dismiss petitioner’s appeal of a Merit Systems Protection Board (board) decision (No. AT075299059) on the ground that the petition for review has not been timely filed. We agree with respondent and accordingly must dismiss the petition.
On May 18, 1979, petitioner, a Food Service Worker Leader with the United States Army Medical Department Activity at Martin Army Hospital in Fort Benning, Georgia, was removed from employment because of his repeated absences without leave.
In his appeal to the board, petitioner argued that his attendance problem was…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Ramos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Richard E. Wilson Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Reeves v. Department of the ArmyUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Stith v. Office of Personnel ManagementUnited States Court of Claims · 1982