Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManning, J.

The complaint stated eleven causes of action, ten of which were assigned, and was in substantially the same form as the supplemental complaint, printed in the record. An answer of the defendant was duly interposed, and the case noticed for trial on or about December 1,1926, and upon its being reached was assigned to Mr. Justice Ceopsey for trial. The trial was commenced, and when proof was put in under the second cause of action and the assignments produced, objection was made to them by counsel for the defendant “ on the ground that they did not convey causes of action against this defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Milliken v. McGarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Silver & Co. v. WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  3. McQuade v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Maliades v. MaliadesNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Wander Iron Works, Inc. v. Methodist HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API