Legal Opinion

Consolidated Tank-Line Co. v. Kansas City Varnish Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided September 5, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Philips, J.,

(orally.) This is an application for injunction and the appointment of a receiver. I have given the case such consideration as the limited opportunity would permit. Of course, on this preliminary hearing, before the coming in of an answer, the principal questions to be determined by the court are as to the existence of the solvency or .insolvency of the defendant corporation, and the necessity for the appointment of a receiver under the circumstances. It appears from the face of the bill, and the affidavits pro and con submitted on the preliminary hearing, that this Kansas City…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Kansas ex rel. Maher v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Cronan v. District CourtIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. City National Bank v. Goshen Woolen Mills Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Slover v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Nappanee Canning Co. v. Reid, Murdoch & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API