Legal Opinion

State v. .

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1794Published

1Opinion of the Court

But WILLIAMS, J., stopped him, saying he could not permit judgments to be taken in that manner; that he conceived the act to be unconstitutional; it was to condemn a man unheard. Bill of Rights, Art. 12, says: "No freeman ought to be taken, imprisoned, or disseised of his freehold, liberties or property, etc., but by the law of the land," and these words mean, according to the course of the common law, which always required the party to be cited, and to have day in Court upon which he might appear and defend himself. Sec. 14 declares that the ancient mode of trial by jury is one of the best…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  2. Walser v. JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. President of the Bank of Newbern v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1813
  4. Worth v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Carr v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1811

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API