Aderhold v. Blumenthal & Beckert

Tbe goods, wben purchased by plaintiffs, were in a rented storehouse, and subject to tbe landlord’s lien. — Code, § 3069. Tbe goods were purchased in bulk, *69and tbe consideration was tbe payment of an antecedent debt. Moreover, tbe goods bad not been removed from tbe storebonse wben they were levied npon at tbe suit of tbe landlord, by attachment for tbe enforcement of bis rent debt. Tbe sale of tbe goods by tbe tenant did not displace tbe prior lien of tbe landlord. — Weil v. McWhorter, 94 Ala. 540. It was proven by tbe witness Toole, and not controverted, tbat appellees knew tbat Toole…