Coleman v. Coleman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, J., Fairfield, February, 1906. Action by Wm. H. Coleman et al. against Martin Coleman et al. From order refusing amendment to answers proposed by- defendants, they appeal. cites: 16 S. C., 216; 18 S. C., 123; 41 S. C., 337; 62 S. C., 300'; 63 S. C., 93; 67 S. C., 451, 280-. cite: 32 S. C., 142; 43 S. C., 229; 34 S. C., 62; 58 S. C., 554; 52 S. C., 464. ‘
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Woods.
The first appeal in this case involved the question whether the plaintiffs were entitled to recover three-fourths of one-seventh of the land described in the complaint, or three-fourths of the entire tract; and it was decided that they had title to three-fourths of the whole. 71 S. C., 518, 51 S. E., 250. After the case was remanded to the Circuit Court the defendants made a motion to' amend their answer and set up certain alleged equities, and this appeal is from an order refusing the motion.
As it is necessary in order to understand…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Hutchison v. FullerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- McDonald v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900