Woolcott v. Woolcott
Michigan Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from Berrien; Coolidge, J. Bill by Samuel Woolcott against Elmer L. Woolcott and Elizabeth A. Woolcott to set aside certain deeds. Erom the decree rendered, both parties appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCabpenteb, J.
The defendant Elmer is a son of complainant. About July 1, 1901, the defendants, who are husband and wife, at the request of complainant and his wife (since deceased), removed from their home' in Nebraska to the farm occupied by complainant, situated near Watervliet, Berrien county, in this State. On the 24th of that month, complainant and his wife deeded said farm to defendant Elmer. That deed imposed upon the defendant the obligation to “support and maintain the said first parties during the term of their natural lives, he or she surviving, * * * furnish them with all the necessaries of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cornell v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Woods v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Root v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Nogaj v. NogajMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Woolcott v. WoolcottMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.