Legal Opinion

Reuter v. Cordes-Hendreks Coiffures, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 8, 1967No. 32PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAM D. JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment action. It was brought in the trial court by appellants for an adjudication that a written compromise settlement agreement containing covenants against competition was null and void as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, that the restrictions as to time and place are unreasonable and should be modified. The case was tried to a jury which answered all special issues in favor of the appellees, defendants below, and judgment was rendered on the verdict of the jury that all relief sought by appellants be denied.

Initially, appellees were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. California Products, Inc. v. Puretex Lemon Juice, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Orange Independent School District v. West Orange Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Harris County Tax Assessor-Collector v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brimmer v. ThomsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Brinkley v. Texas Lottery Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. City of El Paso v. Madero Development, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1991
  4. Securtec, Inc. v. County of Gregg, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  5. City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API