Legal Opinion

Saucedo v. Winger

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 19, 1996No. 73,354PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, J.:

Ray Winger, M.D., defendant, appeals an order of the district court approving a settlement agreement between his malpractice insurer and the plaintiff. Defendant argues the court erred in approving the setdement because his insurance policy did not expressly grant the insurer the right to settle without defendant’s approval and he expressly objected to the settlement. We reverse and remand with directions.

*260FACTS

The facts of this case are not in dispute. This is the second time this case has been presented to the Kansas appellate courts. The background facts leading up to this dispute…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. Feliberty v. DamonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Emp. Surplus Line Ins. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sloan & GlassmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Kurtenbach Ex Rel. KurtenbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. HillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  4. Richert v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API