Legal Opinion

In re Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of the law in 1911. His office was in the borough of Manhattan, but he had considerable practice in Queens county. He is charged with:(1) Having paid certain laymen for soliciting negligence cases in violation of statute and the canons of ethics;(2) Having paid a layman for procuring counsel work for him;(3) Failure to produce records of financial transactions in an investigation conducted before Hon. Leander B. Faber, a justice of the Supreme Court, pursuant to order of this court.

The charges were referred to an official referee to report thereon, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HorovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. People v. HankinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. In re RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. In re RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. In re RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API