Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kleffman v. Bartholomew Circuit Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1964No. 30,413PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

— This is an original action brought by the relators to compel the respondent court to reinstate relators’ petition to intervene and hear the same and other related matters.

The facts presented to us show that a divorce decree was granted to Carl O. Hooker from his wife, Patricia, in June, Í955. At that time the wife was given the custody, of one of their children, while the husband was given the custody of the other, Carmen. Yvonne Hooker, the subject of this controversy.

The relators filed in the trial court a petition to modify the custody order as to Carmen, alleging that Carmen is now nine…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haag v. HaagIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Stone v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Duckworth v. DuckworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Manners v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McDonald v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darrell Kincaid and Donald R. Sceifers v. Kendall I. VailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Inkoff v. InkoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Bicanic v. Lake Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re Adoption of EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Gower v. GowerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API