Legal Opinion

Langel v. Hurwitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtFaber, J.

Motion for an order dismissing the comp oint, on the ground that it appears on the face thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Isidor Betz.

*464The action is for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate made by the defendants Hurwitz and Hollander by which they agreed to purchase from the plaintiff Langel certain premises situated at Belle Harbor, Long Island, title to be closed on October 2, 1925. The complaint alleges, in addition to the making of the contract, that the defendants Hurwitz and Hollander assigned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Marinaro v. PecoraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API