Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 15, 1912No. 738PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26113 (T. D. 31757).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The articles the subject of this appeal, as evidenced by the samples produced at the hearing, are in the main grasses.

There is little testimony in the record, and that seems to be confined to the point of what, if any, process the merchandise had been subjected to at the time of importation. It is not made certain by. the record or the samples whether or not a part of the importation is a palm leaf or a grass. The appearance of the sample would indicate the}former. .......

Counsel for the Government in their brief make the point that there is confusion of samples, which renders intelligible…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EytingeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Abraham v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API