Legal Opinion

Denoux v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1976No. 10781PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellee sued for workmen’s compensation benefits alleging total arid permanent disability. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff-appel-lee, awarding benefits of $49.00 per week, not to exceed 500 weeks, and medical expenses and costs. This appeal followed.

Appellant primarily contends that the lower court erred in holding that appellee's disability is total and permanent within the intendment of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The issues presented are (1) whether appellee is a skilled worker; (2) if so, whether he is able to continue in his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Barr v. Davis Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Lee v. Royal Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Castile v. H. E. Wiese, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Jackson v. Phoenix Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Norman v. Phil-A-Sac, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Denoux v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. Minor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API