Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Simpson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 11, 1957No. 13263PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The trial court permanently enjoined Chet Nichols, appellant, from operating and maintaining a dog kennel at 205 Mount Vernon Court, in the City of San Antonio. The case was tried without a jury, and the court concluded that the kennel constituted a nuisance. On appeal, C. D. Simpson, ap-pellee, urges that Nichols did not timely perfect his appeal. Nichols urges that the decree, at most, should have enjoined the manner of the operation, instead of totally enjoining the operation of the kennel.
The appeal was timely. On March 15, 1957, the judge signed the judgment. On March 25,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arana v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Patton v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Fredericktown v. OsbornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Ellen v. City of BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Holubec v. Brandenburger, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- David Holubec and Mary Holubec v. Carl Brandenburger, Individually, and as Next Friend of Payton Brandenburger and Carson Brandenburger, Kathy Brandenburger, William R. Lee, Laverne Lee, and R&J Livestock Company and Batesville Farming Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001