Legal Opinion
Gill v. Imundi
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 29, 1989No. 88 Civ. 1530 (RWS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Romolo J. Imundi (“Imundi”), United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York, has moved pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1404(a) to transfer this proceeding, in which Ranjit Singh Gill (“Gill”) and Su-khminder Singh Sandhu (“Sandhu”) have petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. For the reasons set forth below, the Government’s motion is denied.
Facts
Petitioners Gill and Sandhu are natives and citizens of India. The Government of India has sought extradition of both petitioners for crimes they…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fernandez v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.