Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 10, 1959No. P. C. No. 7PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This applicant for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act seeks to raise various points of invalidity in his conviction, mostly failure to appoint counsel, with resulting prejudice. We do not reach these points because the lower court made no finding as to indigency, which was alleged and sworn to, and did not appoint counsel as the Act requires in cases of indigency. As a result the case must be sent back. “We read the statute as requiring counsel to be appointed in every case in which the court is satisfied that the allegation of the petitioner that he is unable to pay the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Sutton v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ingram v. Warden of Maryland House of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API