Legal Opinion

Mulcahy v. Damron

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 1991No. 2 CA-CV 90-0304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Presiding Judge.

Judith A. Mulcahy appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of Terry Damron and Marilyn Damron, husband and wife, on Mulcahy’s claim under A.R.S. § 24-521 [renumbered 11-1025], Arizona’s dog bite statute, for personal injuries she received from the Damrons’ dog while Mulcahy was grooming him at the Amphi Pet Hospital. For the reasons stated below, we reverse.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Damrons had kenneled “Zeke,” a bluetick hound, at the Amphi Pet Hospital for four days while they were on vacation. They instructed the pet hospital to groom the dog…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Toney v. BouthillierCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Massey v. ColaricArizona Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borns Ex Rel. Gannon v. VossWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Priebe v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Becker v. LiuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Priebe v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API