Legal Opinion

Heider v. Bernier

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■w TO' "m '•& i»'

Tíii's: is an appeal by John Lacey, one of the two defendants, from a default judgment entered against him in; favor of the plaintiff. The other defendant, Arnold Gr. .Bernier, who also was adjudged in default, has not appealed. The judgment was based upon a promissory note in the sum of $300 signed by Bernier, as "niaker, and later by Lacey, who was payee, as endorser.

The .complaint alleged that the aforementioned Bernier, .on. August 24, 1944, signed the note in question and that it was payable to the defendant-appellant Lacey or order. The note authorized the award of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riner v. Southwestern Surety Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Roberts Myrtlewood Factory, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. James McCaffrey, P.C. v. MichelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API