Legal Opinion
Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Harold F. Ritchie, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, has filed this suit against defendant Chesebrough-Pond’s Inc., a New York corporation, al- Ieging trademark infringement and unfair competition.
Jurisdiction is predicated on the Lan-ham Act (15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1114, 1121), with pendent jurisdiction of the claim of unfair competition (28 U.S.C.A. § 1338(b)).
Plaintiff seeks an injunction against continued use of the word “Valcream” to describe defendant’s product and against the continued use of packages where the contents and labels are alleged to be misleadingly…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Harold F. Ritchie, Inc. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960