Legal Opinion
Verrett v. Stempson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 4, 1993No. 92-SP-186PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On consideration of the motion of counsel for appellant to withdraw and for appointment of new counsel, the response by the District of Columbia thereto, appellant’s motion to stay time for filing response to motion to vacate decision pending resolution of counsel’s motion to withdraw, and the response by the District of Columbia thereto, appellant’s suggestion of mootness and unopposed motion to stay briefing on the merits of appellee’s petition for rehearmg/rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and appellee’s motion to vacate decision, it is
ORDERED that appellee’s motion to vacate…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Verrett v. StempsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
4Cited by7 opinions
- White v. HymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Heard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Stevens v. QuickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Milar Elevator Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ferguson v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.