Rodgers Road Development Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: There is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s determination that petitioner violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1), which prohibits the sale of an alcoholic beverage to persons under the age of 21 years (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181; Matter of Vitagliano v State of N. Y. Liq. Auth., 174 AD2d 624, 624-625). The testimony of the police officer, the sworn statement of the minor, and the testimony of the investigator employed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Culligan's Pub, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Harry's Chenango Wine & Liquor Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Vitagliano v. State of New York Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Nycrest Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.