Legal Opinion
Heidel v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided February 13, 1920No. 22,763PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Geary district court; Roswell L. King, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
The action is one for an injunction to restrain the board of county commissioners of Geary county from establishing a road district to be known as the Humboldt-Dry Creek Road Benefit District No. 1, and from improving certain designated roads therein. The court-denied the relief, and the plaintiff brings the case here for review.
The petition asking for the improvement was filed on April 1, 1919, and was signed by 157 names of resident landowners of the proposed road benefit district; there were 282 resident landowners within the district.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City Street Improvement Co. v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rodgers v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Price v. City of McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Cowles v. School District No. 88Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Griffith v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Field v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Weltmer v. Montrose Rural High School DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950