Legal Opinion

Stonebrink v. Stonebrink

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

These two appeals challenge separate awards of custody of three minor children to the defendant mother.

In April 1968, plaintiff father filed suit for divorce. In his duly verified complaint he alleged that the mother was a fit and proper person to be awarded the custody of the children. His prayer specifically sought the award of custody to her. The case was tried as a default matter.

At the trial, plaintiff testified:

“Q Where are the children now?
“A They’re with their mother.
“Q And it’s satisfactory with you? She’s a proper and fit person to care for the children?
“A Right.
“Q Subject to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooley v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  2. Bennehoff v. BennehoffOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Henry v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Watson v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. MacKey v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rorer v. RorerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. In re the Marriage of GwinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Amundson v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Prindel v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. STATE EX REL JUV. DEPT., CLACKAMAS v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API