Legal Opinion

Moss Industries, Inc. v. Irving Metals Co., Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1948No. Docket 158/247PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Promptly after the final hearing of this cause I filed an ungarnished memorandum in which I announced: "I have given the cause studious consideration, and I have definitely resolved that the counter-claim accompanying the answer of the defendant should be dismissed, and a decree advised in favor of the complainant."

Mr. Irving Reichenthal, who conducts his business activities through the corporate instrumentality known as Irving Metals Company, has chosen to prosecute an appeal which, in view of the decree, is, of course, the right of his company regardless of the activating motive. Hence, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Endicott v. MarvelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  2. Endicott v. MarvelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Marvel v. EndicottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
  4. Moss Ind. v. Irving Metals Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Moss Industries, Inc. v. Irving Metal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API