Allen v. Lelande
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the County Clerk of the County of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
J. Henry Baetz has been nominated as a Republican candidate for the assembly in the sixty-fifth assembly district. The secretary of state has certified to the county clerk of Los Angeles County that he is the Republican nominee for member of the assembly from said district. It is alleged that he is ineligible for that office by reason of non-residence. The county clerk has been requested to strike his name from the official ballot as such candidate, and has refused. We are asked to issue a writ of mandate compelling the clerk to comply with that demand. The constitution of the state…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Comer v. AsheTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
- State Ex Rel. McGrath v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Redding v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Snyder v. GlusingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.