Legal Opinion

Omaha Southern Railway Co. v. Beeson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1893No. 4744PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This is a petition in error from Cass county, and brings up for review the judgment of the district court, assessing the damage of defendant in error by the appropriation of certain property belonging to him adjoining the city of Plattsmouth by plaintiff in error for right of way purposes in the summer of 1890. The first error alleged is the refusal of the court to substitute for the railroad company, the defendant below, certain citizens of Plattsmouth who had agreed to indemnify said company for all money expended for right of way through the property of defendant in error. There is no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. A. & N. R. v. BoernerNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Omaha, Niobrara & Black Hills Railroad v. GerrardNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Idaho-Western Railway Co. v. Columbia Conference of Evangelical Lutheran Augustana SynodIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Mathews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API