Legal Opinion

Farrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 3, 1934No. 16210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Conviction is for violating the provisions of article 1359, P. C., inhibiting the introduction of Johnson Grass; punishment, a fine of one thousand dollars.

Provision is made in article 418, C. C. P., for the substitution of a lost indictment or information. From the present record it appears that on the 14th day of April, 1933, the county attorney presented to the trial court a motion which contained an averment to the effect that on the 6th day of April, 1933, there had been legally presented against appellant a complaint and information charging him with the offense in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. State v. DotsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Dotson, Larry DonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Maples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API