Glover v. State

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

The appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of burglary of a habitation. His punishment, enhanced by one prior conviction, was assessed by the court at 17 years imprisonment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant’s sole ground of error is that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the jury verdict. Because the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged, we will discuss the facts in some detail.

The state’s witness, Robert Brady, identified the appellant at trial as one of two men whom he saw standing next to his neighbor’s car in…