Danger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Defendant in an action on a policy of life insurance appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered on the verdict of a jury. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The issue tried was whether the insured, the father of the plaintiffs, made false negative answers to two questions on his application for insurance, the first as to whether he ever had any ailment or disease of the heart, and the second as to whether he had consulted or had been treated by a physician within five years before he applied for the…