Legal Opinion

Earls v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor Children

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 2018No. CV–17–1044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Second, Ark Code Ann. Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341 provides in pertinent part:(3) An order forever terminating parental rights shall be based upon a finding by clear and convincing evidence:

(A) That it is in the best interest of the juvenile, including consideration of the following factors:

*549(i) The likelihood that the juvenile will be adopted if the termination petition is granted; and(ii) The potential harm, specifically addressing the effect on the health and safety of the child, caused by returning the child to the custody of the parent, parents, or putative parent or parents; and

(B) Of one…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wade v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Bearden v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Taffner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Zgleszewski v. ZgleszewskiSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. King v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. & Minor ChildCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API