Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morris v. Sampsell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1937Published

1DissentFowler, J.

If I could agree with the opinion of the court in this case that the court of Delaware in Roeblings Sons Co. v. Mode, 1 Pennewill (Del.), 515, 43 Atl. 480, construed the statute involved as denying the right of a trustee in bankruptcy to bring suit to recover such dividends as are herein involved I would agree with the decision herein. But that case does not expressly so hold, and in my opinion does not so hold by implication, and I therefore dissent.

The statute construed provides that directors of a corporation who have wilfully or negligently declared dividends *571which have not been paid out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irving Trust Co. v. GunderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. John A. Roeblings Sons Co. v. ModeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1899
  3. Stratton v. BertlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Ulness v. DunnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API