Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1993No. CR92-646PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOLL, Judge.

Defendant, James E. Moore, was previously before us, seeking reversal of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress and complaining of an excessive sentence. State v. Moore, 595 So.2d 334 (La. App. 3rd Cir.1992). We affirmed defendant’s convictions, but remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing to clarify the sentences imposed, to articulate its reasons for the sentences on the misdemeanor convictions, and to elaborate on the restitution plan ordered. Defendant now appeals his resentencing, relying on two assignments of error. We affirm.

The facts of this case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
State v. MetlinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
State v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
State v. BelshaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
State v. AlexisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

State v. DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
State v. BrackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
State v. McCartneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
State ex rel. D.B.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
State v. JacksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.