Legal Opinion

Mosser v. Denbury Resources, Inc.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided June 24, 2015No. Case No. 1:13-cv-148PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*909ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CHARLES S. MILLER, JR., United States Magistrate Judge.

In this action, plaintiffs allege that defendants (collectively “Denbury”) have tor-tiously and unlawfully invaded the subsurface of their property by using it as a permanént site for disposing of salt water generated from oil and gas drilling operations without their permission. 'In addition to seeking damages for the affront of the claimed trespass and for nuisance, plaintiffs also seek statutory compensation under North Dakota’s surface owner protection law for' the loss of the economic…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Homer Merriman v. Xto Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mosser v. Denbury Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Bang, et al. v. Continental ResourcesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Northwest Landowners Association v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Northwest Landowners Association v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. ASBURY v. EQT CORPORATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API