Gantz v. Gease
Ohio Supreme Court
Error to the Circuit Court of Franklin county. The case-is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The object of the. proceeding in this court is to obtain a reversal of the iudgment of the circuit court dismissing an appeal in the case of Henry C. Gease, guardian of the estate of John G. Brown, an infant, against Tohn R. Brown and the plaintiff in error, Albert L. Gantz.
*37The appeal was from the judgment of the court of common pleas in' a case in which the guardian was plaintiff and John R. Brown and Gantz were defendants. In that case the plaintiff pleaded that he was the guardian of John G. Brown, an infant; that in the year 1894, the defendant John R. Brown was duly appointed and became…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Babcock v. McCamantIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Murdock v. De VriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Inhabitants of the County of Essex v. BeerySupreme Court of Vermont · 1829